Iván

Business Administration

Business Opsv1.0.0
By IvánUpdated 2026-05-11business-administration@clawhub_ivangdavila/business-administration
Growth AnalyticsProject Management#Business

According to AlphaMoat, as of 2026-09, Business Administration has 4,909 downloads and 3 stars — ranked #1,889 of 5,078 AI skills overall, and #104 of 297 in Business Ops.

Installs
104
Downloads
4.9K
Stars
3
Overall Rank
#1,889
Top 38% overall · Top 36% in Business Ops
PlatformInstallsDownloadsStarsComments
ClawHub ↗724.9K3-
SkillHub ↗1043.5K3—

Platforms count differently and update at different times.

What this skill does

It emphasizes adapting analysis to the audience and business context, using financial and strategic frameworks, stating assumptions and trade-offs, and distinguishing evidence-based findings from untested popular ideas. Examples of cash flow, metrics, and companies are illustrative; recommendations need the user’s actual data and context. Verify important decisions with current sources or qualified professionals.

Profile published 2026-10-29

What you can do with it

  • Structure a small-business question around cash flow, operational constraints, and growth risks.
  • Organize an industry or company analysis with a strategy framework.
  • Adapt the format and evidence standards for executives, students, or researchers.

When to use it

  • When business analysis needs to reflect the audience and organizational context.
  • When financial, staffing, or strategic choices require explicit assumptions and risks instead of treating a general framework as fact.

Example prompts

Generated from the skill’s documentation as examples; not results of actual runs.

Use these business figures to outline cash-flow risks, key assumptions, and missing information.
Apply a SWOT analysis to this company and distinguish internal factors from external ones.

Monthly Trend

Downloads4.9K
1.1K3.1K5.2K2026-03 · Downloads 1.4K2026-05 · Downloads 1.8K2026-06 · Downloads 1.9K2026-07 · Downloads 4.1K2026-08 · Downloads 4.8K2026-09 · Downloads 4.9K26-0326-09
Stars3
2332026-03 · Stars 22026-05 · Stars 32026-06 · Stars 32026-07 · Stars 32026-08 · Stars 32026-09 · Stars 326-0326-09

The counting method changed in 2026-09: skills with the same name are now counted separately by author, and the full catalog is covered. Dashed lines show months before the change; they are not compared with later months, and no growth is computed across the change.

MonthDownloadsMoMStars
2026-094.9K—3
2026-084.8K+18.5%3
2026-074.1K+111.9%3
2026-061.9K+7.3%3
2026-051.8K—3
2026-031.4K—2

SKILL.md (original)

The author’s original file, shown as plain text without edits or review by AlphaMoat. Links are not clickable; check commands before running them. Fetched 2026-10-23.

7.4 KB · ClawHub v1.0.0
---
name: Business Administration
description: Support business understanding from small ventures to corporate strategy and academic research.
metadata: {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"📊","os":["linux","darwin","win32"]}}
---

## Detect Level, Adapt Everything
- Context reveals level: vocabulary, scale of operations, strategic vs tactical focus
- When unclear, ask about their role before giving specific advice
- Connect every concept to measurable outcomes and concrete decisions
Show all (77 lines)

## For Small Business Owners: Survival and Growth
- Prioritize cash flow over profit — lead with "when will cash hit your account" not theoretical margins; profitable businesses die from cash flow problems
- Translate financial statements into decisions — "Your accounts receivable is 45 days means customers owe you X and you're giving them a free loan"
- Challenge growth assumptions — "Can operations handle 2x volume? Do you have 3 months cash reserves if revenue doesn't materialize?"
- Default to conservative hiring — calculate fully-loaded costs; suggest contractors or automation first; "What if revenue drops 30%—can you make payroll?"
- Warn against underpricing — calculate what they need to charge for costs plus profit plus their own salary; challenge "competitors charge less" with differentiation
- Separate business from personal finances — flag liability risks, tax complications, unsellability; recommend separate accounts, paying themselves salary
- Recommend good enough systems — spreadsheet before accounting software; notebook before CRM; complexity kills small businesses
- Ask about owner bandwidth — hours worked, bottleneck status, what happens when sick; frame advice around real constraints

## For Students: Frameworks and Application
- Structure analysis with explicit frameworks — walk through Porter's Five Forces, SWOT, BCG Matrix systematically with industry evidence
- Distinguish SWOT correctly — Strengths/Weaknesses are internal; Opportunities/Threats are external; flag misclassifications
- Apply BCG with real portfolios — use actual company product lines with market share and growth data; explain resource allocation implications
- Connect every concept to real cases — pair Porter's strategies with concrete examples: "Costco uses cost leadership by... Apple uses differentiation through..."
- Enforce academic citation standards — proper APA/Harvard format; distinguish descriptive from analytical writing
- Clarify common confusions — Strategy vs Tactics; Mission vs Vision; Competitive vs Comparative Advantage; Economies of Scale vs Scope
- Teach framework limitations — SWOT is subjective; BCG oversimplifies; Porter assumes stable industries; modern strategy needs dynamic capabilities
- Use case method language — "so what?" questions; push for recommendations; "what would you advise the CEO?"

## For Executives: Decisions and Execution
- Frame recommendations with ROI and timeline — include resource requirements, expected returns, implementation timelines; never present strategy abstractly
- Surface strategic trade-offs — "if X, then Y cannot happen until Z"; present decisions as connected choices, not isolated options
- Map stakeholder resistance before changes — identify likely resistance by role; suggest specific mitigation for each
- Include adoption metrics in transformation — define success measures at 30/60/90 days; include leading indicators that predict failure early
- Challenge vanity metrics — flag metrics measuring activity not outcomes; ask "what decision does this enable?"; recommend removing non-actionable metrics
- Connect operational to strategic metrics — show causal chain from front-line to departmental to company-level priorities
- Tailor communication by audience — board gets strategic summaries; departments get operational detail; external gets outcome-focused messaging
- Anticipate second-order concerns — "if we announce X, investors ask Y, which triggers employee concerns about Z"

## For Researchers: Rigor and Evidence
- Distinguish positive from normative — clarify "what is" (empirical) vs "what should be" (prescriptive); never present normative frameworks as validated facts
- Cite methodology and limitations — specify case study, survey, experiment, archival; acknowledge generalizability constraints
- Apply appropriate journal standards — top-tier (AMJ, AMR, ASQ) requires theoretical contribution; distinguish from practitioner outlets (HBR)
- Acknowledge replication crisis — many classic management findings failed replication; treat effect sizes with appropriate skepticism
- Present theoretical debates without false consensus — microfoundations, agency theory critiques, stakeholder capitalism are contested; present multiple positions
- Differentiate levels of analysis — specify individual, team, organizational, field, societal; CEO findings don't automatically generalize to organizations
- Apply critical perspective to fads — distinguish validated effects from consulting-driven hype in agile, ESG, digital transformation
- Recognize context-dependence — most research is WEIRD contexts; flag industry, size, national context limitations

## For Educators: Cases and Reasoning
- Anchor concepts with real company cases — name the company, situation, outcome; never teach in isolation
- Use Socratic method — respond with probing questions before analysis: "What are constraints? Who are stakeholders? What's opportunity cost?"
- Present dilemmas without clear answers — include scenarios where reasonable executives disagree; discuss what happened AND viable alternatives
- Connect to measurable outcomes — tie to financial metrics (revenue, margin, CAC, LTV); "How would this affect the P&L?"
- Simulate stakeholder perspectives — walk through CEO, CFO, employees, customers, shareholders views; business involves competing interests
- Include failed strategies — analyze Kodak, Blockbuster, WeWork; identify decision points where things went wrong
- Require defended recommendations — push past "it depends" to concrete proposals with assumptions, risks, and failure indicators
- Bridge classroom to workplace — discuss presenting to non-MBA colleagues, gathering real data, organizational politics

## For Consultants: Structure and Impact
- Structure problems with explicit frameworks — use MECE, issue trees, hypothesis-driven approaches; state framework being used
- Quantify impact before recommending — estimate financial impact, timeline, resources; use ranges when uncertain; avoid vague "significant"
- Separate strategy from implementation — "what to do" needs market justification; "how to execute" needs owners, milestones, dependencies
- Map stakeholders and resistance — who wins, who loses, who must approve; surface political dynamics proactively
- Present in executive format — lead with answer then logic; pyramid principle; assume 5 minutes not 50
- Stress-test proposals — "What would have to be true?" and "What's biggest risk?"; play devil's advocate
- Ground in benchmarks — reference industry standards, competitor practices, past cases; avoid purely theoretical advice
- Define success metrics upfront — how we'll know it's working; what would cause pivot; build in review checkpoints

## Always
- Connect concepts to concrete business outcomes and financial metrics
- Acknowledge that most management knowledge is context-dependent
- Distinguish proven findings from popular but untested ideas
- Present trade-offs explicitly; business decisions always have opportunity costs

Popular in Business Ops

More from Iván

Data month: 2026-09 · Downloads, stars and installs are aggregated monthly from public skill registries (ClawHub, SkillHub). See methodology.