Iván

Scholar

Knowledgev1.0.0
By IvánUpdated 2026-05-11scholar@clawhub_ivangdavila/scholar
Knowledge Base Q&AInformation Retrieval

According to AlphaMoat, as of 2026-09, Scholar has 4,734 downloads and 6 stars — ranked #1,996 of 5,078 AI skills overall, and #187 of 442 in Knowledge.

Installs
526
Downloads
4.7K
Stars
6
Overall Rank
#1,996
Top 40% overall · Top 43% in Knowledge
PlatformInstallsDownloadsStarsComments
ClawHub ↗1404.4K3-
SkillHub ↗5264.7K6—

Platforms count differently and update at different times.

What this skill does

This skill provides practical rules for Google Scholar literature search, covering query construction, time filters, result interpretation, full-text access, citation analysis, alerts and tracking, plus awareness of limitations and source evaluation. It declares support for multiple operating systems and is a pure search-guidance skill with no binary or key dependency. This is guidance for manual Scholar searches, not an automated full-text search or quality check. Verify the paper and venue before citing.

Profile published 2026-10-27

What you can do with it

  • Build exact queries with quotes and exclusions
  • Filter recent research by time
  • Analyze author citations and source reputation

When to use it

  • When searching academic literature or reviews
  • When evaluating paper quality and trust
  • When tracking new papers on a topic

Example prompts

Generated from the skill’s documentation as examples; not results of actual runs.

Search Google Scholar for recent papers on a topic
Build a query that excludes irrelevant terms
Assess whether a paper source is trustworthy

Monthly Trend

Downloads4.7K
2.4K3.7K4.9K2026-03 · Downloads 2.6K2026-05 · Downloads 3.4K2026-06 · Downloads 3.6K2026-07 · Downloads 3.9K2026-08 · Downloads 4.2K2026-09 · Downloads 4.7K26-0326-09
Stars6
3562026-03 · Stars 32026-05 · Stars 52026-06 · Stars 32026-07 · Stars 62026-08 · Stars 62026-09 · Stars 626-0326-09

The counting method changed in 2026-09: skills with the same name are now counted separately by author, and the full catalog is covered. Dashed lines show months before the change; they are not compared with later months, and no growth is computed across the change.

MonthDownloadsMoMStars
2026-094.7K—6
2026-084.2K+6.3%6
2026-073.9K+10.4%6
2026-063.6K+5.8%3
2026-053.4K—5
2026-032.6K—3

SKILL.md (original)

The author’s original file, shown as plain text without edits or review by AlphaMoat. Links are not clickable; check commands before running them. Fetched 2026-10-23.

4.0 KB · ClawHub v1.0.0
---
name: Scholar
description: Search academic literature with Google Scholar using effective queries, citations, and filters.
metadata: {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"🎓","os":["linux","darwin","win32"]}}
---

# Google Scholar Research Rules

## Query Construction
- Exact phrases in quotes: "machine learning" finds the phrase, not separate words
Show all (78 lines)
- Exclude terms with minus: neural networks -deep removes deep learning results
- OR for alternatives: "global warming" OR "climate change" — must be uppercase
- author: operator for specific researchers: author:"Y LeCun"
- source: for specific journals: source:"Nature" quantum computing
- intitle: forces term in title: intitle:transformer attention

## Time Filters
- Custom range critical for recent research — default shows highly cited old papers first
- "Since 2023" for cutting-edge but less vetted work
- "Since 2020" balances recency and citation accumulation
- Sort by date for newest, sort by relevance for most cited — toggle based on need

## Understanding Results
- Citation count indicates influence, not quality — popular isn't always right
- "Cited by X" link shows who built on this work — follow research forward
- "Related articles" finds similar work — useful after finding one good paper
- Versions link shows preprints and alternate copies — often free when journal isn't
- Quotation marks in snippet show exact matches — verify relevance before clicking

## Finding Full Text
- Check "All versions" for free copies — preprints, institutional repositories
- Add filetype:pdf to find direct PDF links
- Unpaywall browser extension auto-finds legal free versions
- Request from authors directly — most will share, academia.edu and ResearchGate common
- Institutional access through library proxy — VPN to university network

## Citation Analysis
- h-index visible on author profiles — measures productivity and impact
- "Cited by" sorted by relevance shows most influential citations
- Citation count alone misleads — review papers cite heavily but add less
- Self-citations inflate metrics — check who's actually citing
- Recent citations more meaningful for living research — old papers cited by habit

## Alerts and Tracking
- Create alerts for search terms — email when new papers match
- Follow researchers via profiles — notifications for new publications
- "Cite" button exports to reference managers — BibTeX, EndNote, RefMan
- Save to library requires Google account — organizes papers for later

## Limitations to Know
- Coverage biased toward English and STEM — humanities and non-English underrepresented
- No quality filter — predatory journals appear alongside legitimate ones
- Older papers may not be indexed — pre-digital era incomplete
- Cannot search full text — only titles, abstracts, and metadata
- Ranking algorithm opaque — not always clear why results ordered as shown

## Evaluating Sources
- Check journal reputation before trusting — impact factor as rough guide
- Preprints not peer-reviewed — valuable for speed, treat as preliminary
- Conference papers vary by field — top-tier in CS, lower status in medicine
- Retracted papers may still appear — verify paper status before citing
- Thesis and dissertations are gray literature — use cautiously

## Search Strategies
- Start broad, narrow with filters — missing papers worse than sorting many
- Combine Scholar with domain databases — PubMed for medicine, IEEE for engineering
- Snowball: find one good paper, explore its citations and references
- Check review papers for comprehensive coverage — synthesize existing knowledge
- Multiple queries with synonyms — terminology varies across disciplines

## Common Mistakes
- Trusting citation count as quality measure
- Ignoring publication date — fields evolve, old papers may be outdated
- Stopping at first page of results — good papers may be buried
- Not checking for retractions or corrections
- Citing papers based only on abstract — always read methodology
- Missing preprint versions that are freely available

Popular in Knowledge

More from Iván

Data month: 2026-09 · Downloads, stars and installs are aggregated monthly from public skill registries (ClawHub, SkillHub). See methodology.