h-harry

Skill Vetter 1

IT Ops & Securityv1.0.0
By h-harryUpdated 2026-05-11skill-vetter-1@clawhub_h-harry/skill-vetter-1
Security ScanningPermission Checks#GitHub#Permission

According to AlphaMoat, as of 2026-09, Skill Vetter 1 has 1,512 downloads and 0 stars — ranked #4,760 of 5,078 AI skills overall, and #258 of 264 in IT Ops & Security.

Installs
103
Downloads
1.5K
Stars
-
Overall Rank
#4,760
Top 94% overall · Top 98% in IT Ops & Security
PlatformInstallsDownloadsStarsComments
ClawHub ↗331.2K--
SkillHub ↗1031.5K-—

Platforms count differently and update at different times.

What this skill does

It recommends checking provenance and maintenance information, reviewing all code, assessing permission scope and suspicious behavior, and producing a risk classification. The document also lists commands that fetch repository data or source files online; do not automatically run them during a static review. A review should state its evidence scope and unresolved checks.

Profile published 2026-10-29

What you can do with it

  • Review a skill’s source, purpose, permissions, and external-access scope.
  • Look for code that may access credentials, run commands, or modify system files.
  • Create a risk classification and list questions that still need verification.

When to use it

  • Before installing or running an agent skill from an unknown source.
  • When evaluating files, commands, and permission scope from repository source.
  • When reporting a security conclusion, distinguishing reviewed content from unread dependencies and unverified provenance.

Example prompts

Generated from the skill’s documentation as examples; not results of actual runs.

Create a read-only review checklist from the provided skill files without accessing the network or running code.
List permissions and high-risk behaviors that need human confirmation, separating facts from open questions.

Monthly Trend

Downloads1.5K
4191.0K1.6K2026-03 · Downloads 5002026-05 · Downloads 7942026-07 · Downloads 1.1K2026-08 · Downloads 1.2K2026-09 · Downloads 1.5K26-0326-09
Stars-
0112026-03 · Stars -2026-05 · Stars -2026-07 · Stars -2026-08 · Stars -2026-09 · Stars -26-0326-09

The counting method changed in 2026-09: skills with the same name are now counted separately by author, and the full catalog is covered. Dashed lines show months before the change; they are not compared with later months, and no growth is computed across the change.

MonthDownloadsMoMStars
2026-091.5K—-
2026-081.2K+11.4%-
2026-071.1K—-
2026-05794—-
2026-03500—-

SKILL.md (original)

The author’s original file, shown as plain text without edits or review by AlphaMoat. Links are not clickable; check commands before running them. Fetched 2026-10-23.

4.5 KB · ClawHub v1.0.0
---
name: skill-vetter
version: 1.0.0
description: Security-first skill vetting for AI agents. Use before installing any skill from ClawdHub, GitHub, or other sources. Checks for red flags, permission scope, and suspicious patterns.
---

# Skill Vetter 🔒

Security-first vetting protocol for AI agent skills. **Never install a skill without vetting it first.**
Show all (139 lines)
## When to Use

- Before installing any skill from ClawdHub
- Before running skills from GitHub repos
- When evaluating skills shared by other agents
- Anytime you're asked to install unknown code

## Vetting Protocol

### Step 1: Source Check

```
Questions to answer:
- [ ] Where did this skill come from?
- [ ] Is the author known/reputable?
- [ ] How many downloads/stars does it have?
- [ ] When was it last updated?
- [ ] Are there reviews from other agents?
```

### Step 2: Code Review (MANDATORY)

Read ALL files in the skill. Check for these **RED FLAGS**:

```
🚨 REJECT IMMEDIATELY IF YOU SEE:
─────────────────────────────────────────
• curl/wget to unknown URLs
• Sends data to external servers
• Requests credentials/tokens/API keys
• Reads ~/.ssh, ~/.aws, ~/.config without clear reason
• Accesses MEMORY.md, USER.md, SOUL.md, IDENTITY.md
• Uses base64 decode on anything
• Uses eval() or exec() with external input
• Modifies system files outside workspace
• Installs packages without listing them
• Network calls to IPs instead of domains
• Obfuscated code (compressed, encoded, minified)
• Requests elevated/sudo permissions
• Accesses browser cookies/sessions
• Touches credential files
─────────────────────────────────────────
```

### Step 3: Permission Scope

```
Evaluate:
- [ ] What files does it need to read?
- [ ] What files does it need to write?
- [ ] What commands does it run?
- [ ] Does it need network access? To where?
- [ ] Is the scope minimal for its stated purpose?
```

### Step 4: Risk Classification

| Risk Level | Examples | Action |
|------------|----------|--------|
| 🟢 LOW | Notes, weather, formatting | Basic review, install OK |
| 🟡 MEDIUM | File ops, browser, APIs | Full code review required |
| 🔴 HIGH | Credentials, trading, system | Human approval required |
| ⛔ EXTREME | Security configs, root access | Do NOT install |

## Output Format

After vetting, produce this report:

```
SKILL VETTING REPORT
═══════════════════════════════════════
Skill: [name]
Source: [ClawdHub / GitHub / other]
Author: [username]
Version: [version]
───────────────────────────────────────
METRICS:
• Downloads/Stars: [count]
• Last Updated: [date]
• Files Reviewed: [count]
───────────────────────────────────────
RED FLAGS: [None / List them]

PERMISSIONS NEEDED:
• Files: [list or "None"]
• Network: [list or "None"]  
• Commands: [list or "None"]
───────────────────────────────────────
RISK LEVEL: [🟢 LOW / 🟡 MEDIUM / 🔴 HIGH / ⛔ EXTREME]

VERDICT: [✅ SAFE TO INSTALL / ⚠️ INSTALL WITH CAUTION / ❌ DO NOT INSTALL]

NOTES: [Any observations]
═══════════════════════════════════════
```

## Quick Vet Commands

For GitHub-hosted skills:
```bash
# Check repo stats
curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/OWNER/REPO" | jq '{stars: .stargazers_count, forks: .forks_count, updated: .updated_at}'

# List skill files
curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/OWNER/REPO/contents/skills/SKILL_NAME" | jq '.[].name'

# Fetch and review SKILL.md
curl -s "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OWNER/REPO/main/skills/SKILL_NAME/SKILL.md"
```

## Trust Hierarchy

1. **Official OpenClaw skills** → Lower scrutiny (still review)
2. **High-star repos (1000+)** → Moderate scrutiny
3. **Known authors** → Moderate scrutiny
4. **New/unknown sources** → Maximum scrutiny
5. **Skills requesting credentials** → Human approval always

## Remember

- No skill is worth compromising security
- When in doubt, don't install
- Ask your human for high-risk decisions
- Document what you vet for future reference

---

*Paranoia is a feature.* 🔒🦀

Popular in IT Ops & Security

Data month: 2026-09 · Downloads, stars and installs are aggregated monthly from public skill registries (ClawHub, SkillHub). See methodology.