According to AlphaMoat, in September 2026 Teable 2.0 (teable.ai) received 34,254 monthly visits (+119.9% MoM) — ranked #6,377 of 18,351 AI websites with traffic data, and #716 of 1,822 in Programming; its largest market is China (24.0% of visits).
What is Teable 2.0
Teable is a business-facing AI multidimensional table that turns data into AI workflows and custom apps, connecting everything needed to build business solutions.
- 01Manage data with AI multidimensional tables
- 02turn data into custom apps
- 03automate workflows
- 04native AI agents for CRUD
Free version $0 per seat per month; Pro version $10 per seat per month; Business version $20 per seat per month.
12-Month Traffic Trend
| Month | Monthly visits | MoM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-01 | 39.5K | — |
| 2026-02 | 25.3K | -35.9% |
| 2026-03 | 40.1K | +58.5% |
| 2026-04 | 55.7K | +38.8% |
| 2026-05 | 32.3K | -42.1% |
| 2026-06 | 25.7K | -20.3% |
| 2026-07 | 27.0K | +4.9% |
| 2026-08 | 15.6K | -42.2% |
| 2026-09 | 34.3K | +119.9% |
Visits by Country · Top 5
Popular in Programming
FAQ
How many monthly visits does Teable 2.0 get?
According to AlphaMoat, Teable 2.0 (teable.ai) received 34,254 visits (about 34.3K) in September 2026 (+119.9% month over month), ranking #6,377 of 18,351 AI websites with traffic data, and #716 in Programming.
Is Teable 2.0’s traffic growing?
Over the last 9 months, Teable 2.0’s monthly visits went from 39.5K in January 2026 to 34.3K in September 2026 — down 13.2% overall; traffic peaked in April 2026 (55.7K).
Where do Teable 2.0’s visitors come from?
In September 2026, Teable 2.0’s largest markets by share of visits are China 24.0%, United States 23.5%, India 9.3%.
What are some alternatives to Teable 2.0?
In Programming, the other products with the most monthly visits are Guardio (46.6M), Wix AI Website Builder (30.5M), Lovable (29.9M), Cursor (21.5M), Netlify (16.3M).
Data month: 2026-09 · Visit figures are third-party traffic estimates aggregated monthly — best for scale and trends. Multiple domains of the same product are merged. See methodology.