Iván

Cursor

開発v1.0.0
作者:Iván更新日 2026-05-11cursor@clawhub_ivangdavila/cursor
コード生成バグ修正

AlphaMoatによると、2026-09時点でCursorのダウンロード数は2,374、スター数は4で、AIスキル全体5,078件中4,193位、開発では577件中517位です。

インストール数
104
ダウンロード数
2374
スター数
4
総合順位
#4,193
全体の上位 83% · 開発の上位 90%
プラットフォームインストール数ダウンロード数スター数コメント
ClawHub ↗6221844-
SkillHub ↗10423743—

プラットフォームごとに集計方法と集計時点が異なります。

このスキルでできること

エディターとCLIの使い方、プロジェクト規則、リポジトリのコンテキストやインデックス管理に加え、Background Agents、Bugbot、MCPなどのリモート機能や連携を扱います。使用中の画面、データの流れ、プロジェクト規則を先に確認し、リモート実行や高信頼の非対話モードには明示的な承認を求めます。作業の最後にはdiffや確認結果など、レビュー可能な証拠を残します。

資料公開日 2026-10-29

できること

  • タスクに適したCursorエディターまたはCLIの作業方法を選ぶ。
  • プロジェクト規則、コンテキスト範囲、プライバシー設定を整理する。
  • Background Agents、Bugbot、MCPがタスクに適するか評価する。

使う場面

  • Cursorの複数の画面や機能から作業方法を選ぶとき。
  • リポジトリのプライバシー、リモート実行、連携権限を扱うとき。
  • エージェント作業にレビュー可能な成果物を残したいとき。

プロンプト例

スキルのドキュメントをもとに生成した例であり、実際の実行結果ではありません。

このタスクでCursorエディター、CLI、リモートエージェントのどれを使うか選び、事前に確認する権限を列挙してください。
この計画にリポジトリ範囲、コンテキストのデータフロー、最終レビューの証拠が明記されているか確認してください。

月次の推移

ダウンロード数2374
770163224932026-03 · ダウンロード数 8892026-05 · ダウンロード数 14502026-06 · ダウンロード数 16002026-07 · ダウンロード数 18682026-08 · ダウンロード数 20212026-09 · ダウンロード数 237426-0326-09
スター数4
2342026-03 · スター数 22026-05 · スター数 32026-06 · スター数 32026-07 · スター数 32026-08 · スター数 42026-09 · スター数 426-0326-09

2026-09 から集計方法を変更し、同名スキルを作者ごとに分けて集計し、全スキルを対象にしました。破線は変更前の月で、変更後のデータとは直接比較せず、変更をまたぐ増減も計算していません。 同名の別スキルがあるため、変更前のデータは現在ダウンロード数が最も多いこのスキルに帰属させています。

月ダウンロード数前月比スター数
2026-092374—4
2026-082021+8.2%4
2026-071868+16.8%3
2026-061600+10.3%3
2026-051450—3
2026-03889—2

SKILL.md 原文

作者が公開した元のファイルをテキストのまま表示しています。AlphaMoat による編集や審査はしていません。リンクはクリックできません。コマンドは内容を確認してから実行してください。取得日 2026-10-23。

11 KB・ClawHub v1.0.0
---
name: Cursor
slug: cursor
version: 1.0.0
homepage: https://clawic.com/skills/cursor
description: Use Cursor safely across editor, CLI, rules, background agents, Bugbot, and MCP workflows with repo-aware context and reviewable execution.
changelog: Initial release with editor and CLI guidance, rules and context control, background agent and Bugbot guardrails, privacy notes, and recovery workflows.
metadata: {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"⌨️","requires":{"bins":["cursor-agent"],"bins.optional":["cursor","git","rg"],"config":["~/cursor/"]},"os":["linux","darwin","win32"],"configPaths":["~/cursor/"]}}
---
すべて表示(全 184 行)
## When to Use

User wants to operate Cursor as a real coding environment instead of a vague AI editor: choose the right surface, shape repo context, set rules correctly, use `cursor-agent`, run Background Agents, review with Bugbot, or decide whether MCP and remote execution are acceptable.

Use this skill when the hard part is not "write code" but "make Cursor behave predictably" across editor chat, Agent or Ask flows, CLI runs, project rules, repo indexing, remote agents, GitHub integration, and privacy-sensitive work.

## Architecture

Memory lives in `~/cursor/`. If `~/cursor/` does not exist, run `setup.md`. See `memory-template.md` for structure.

```text
~/cursor/
|-- memory.md            # Durable activation boundaries and workflow defaults
|-- repo-profiles.md     # Per-repo conventions, trust posture, and verification expectations
|-- rules-notes.md       # Project-rule strategy, legacy rule cleanup, and instruction hierarchy notes
|-- privacy.md           # Indexing, ignore, remote execution, and data-handling defaults
|-- remote-workflows.md  # Background Agent, Bugbot, and GitHub integration decisions
`-- incidents.md         # Repeated failures, wrong-surface runs, and recovery patterns
```

## Quick Reference

Load only the smallest file needed for the current blocker.

| Topic | File |
|-------|------|
| Setup guide | `setup.md` |
| Memory template | `memory-template.md` |
| Install and choose the right Cursor surface | `install-and-surfaces.md` |
| Rules, context hierarchy, and mode choice | `rules-and-context.md` |
| `cursor-agent`, non-interactive runs, and MCP boundaries | `cli-and-mcp.md` |
| Background Agents, Bugbot, and GitHub-connected workflows | `background-agents-and-bugbot.md` |
| Privacy mode, indexing, and ignore files | `privacy-and-indexing.md` |
| Recovery playbooks for auth, bad context, and remote-run mistakes | `troubleshooting.md` |

## Requirements

- Cursor installed and usable on the target machine, or permission to guide installation.
- `cursor-agent` available when the task depends on CLI or automation workflows.
- `git` available for repo-aware work, diff review, branch handling, Background Agents, or Bugbot.
- Explicit user approval before enabling Background Agents, granting GitHub app write access, using remote MCP servers, or running high-trust non-interactive commands.
- Treat model names, mode behavior, CLI flags, and remote-workflow features as live product surface: verify against official Cursor docs or current CLI help instead of assuming stale behavior.

## Operating Coverage

This skill treats Cursor as an operational coding system, not as generic editor advice. It covers:
- editor-side usage across Agent, Ask, Manual, and custom mode patterns
- project rules through `.cursor/rules`, user rules, and repo-level agent guidance, with `.cursorrules` treated as legacy
- context shaping through repo boundaries, indexing, and ignore files
- local and non-interactive `cursor-agent` workflows, including resume and MCP-aware execution
- Background Agents and Bugbot when work shifts from local interaction to remote GitHub-connected execution
- privacy, data exposure, and review discipline when Cursor features move code or prompts off the local machine

## Data Storage

Keep only durable Cursor operating context in `~/cursor/`:
- which repos, teams, or task types are approved for Cursor use
- preferred surface by task type: editor, CLI, Background Agent, or Bugbot
- rule hierarchy decisions and recurring `.cursor/rules` patterns that worked
- privacy and trust defaults around indexing, ignore files, GitHub integration, and remote MCP
- repeated failures such as wrong repo scope, ignored rules, unsafe non-interactive runs, or remote review noise

## Core Rules

### 1. Lock the Cursor Surface First
- Name the active surface before doing anything else: editor Agent, Ask, Manual, custom mode, `cursor-agent`, Background Agent, or Bugbot.
- Each surface changes permissions, context loading, and review expectations.
- Advice that ignores the surface usually causes the wrong workflow or trust level.

### 2. Establish the Instruction Hierarchy Before Prompting
- Check for project rules in `.cursor/rules`, repo agent guidance, and any team-level user rules before asking Cursor to act.
- Treat `.cursorrules` as a legacy format that may still exist but should not be your default design target.
- If rules conflict or are too broad, fix the rule layout before expanding the prompt.

### 3. Shape Context Deliberately
- Control what Cursor sees through repo selection, indexing posture, and ignore files instead of assuming it "just knows the repo."
- Use `.cursorignore` and `.cursorindexingignore` for context control, but never treat them as perfect secret barriers.
- When a task is narrow, reduce context first instead of adding more instructions later.

### 4. Separate Local Work From Remote Work
- Editor Agent and local CLI use are different from Background Agents and Bugbot.
- Remote GitHub-connected runs can execute commands, fetch code, and generate review output outside the local machine.
- Escalate to remote workflows only when the value is clear and the trust story is explicit.

### 5. Treat Non-Interactive CLI and MCP as High-Trust Modes
- `cursor-agent` is powerful, and non-interactive usage does not deserve casual assumptions about safety.
- Review MCP server scope, host, and side effects before turning it on.
- If a workflow depends on unattended writes, record the exact repo, command goal, and verification path first.

### 6. Make Privacy and Data Flow Explicit
- Cursor requests, indexing, and remote workflows may send code or prompts to Cursor services, GitHub, or user-approved MCP hosts.
- Privacy Mode changes expectations, but it does not make remote features equivalent to local-only execution.
- The user should know what leaves the machine before you enable higher-trust features.

### 7. End With Reviewable Evidence
- A good Cursor run ends with a diff, a check result, or a clear checkpoint, not just "the agent handled it."
- For Background Agents and Bugbot, inspect the output before merging or applying anything locally.
- Leave a concise handoff trail so the next operator can resume without guessing which surface ran what.

## Cursor Traps

- Treating every Cursor feature as local-only -> remote execution and GitHub-connected workflows get approved without real review.
- Dumping instructions into chat before checking `.cursor/rules` or repo agent guidance -> the repo's own guidance loses to prompt churn.
- Assuming `.cursorignore` blocks every possible data path -> terminal and MCP tool calls can still touch things you did not intend.
- Using Background Agents because they are convenient -> remote command execution happens before the trust boundary is discussed.
- Treating `cursor-agent` automation as if it had interactive approvals -> non-interactive runs can widen scope quickly.
- Mixing Bugbot, editor Agent, and local git state without naming ownership -> review noise and duplicated work pile up.
- Assuming an API key means direct provider execution -> Cursor still mediates product behavior and trust boundaries.

## External Endpoints

Only these endpoint categories are allowed unless the user explicitly approves more:

| Endpoint | Data Sent | Purpose |
|----------|-----------|---------|
| https://cursor.com/* | prompts, selected repo context, diffs, integration metadata, and remote-workflow payloads needed by Cursor features | Cursor editor, agent, indexing, Background Agent, and review workflows |
| https://docs.cursor.com/* | doc queries only | Verify current Cursor behavior, feature scope, and integration details |
| https://github.com/* | repository metadata, code, pull-request context, and review actions approved by the user | Background Agents, Bugbot, and GitHub-connected Cursor workflows |
| https://api.github.com/* | repository, branch, PR, and review metadata approved by the user | GitHub API access used by Cursor-connected review and remote execution flows |
| https://{user-approved-mcp-host} | request payloads required by the approved MCP server | Optional MCP tool access beyond the local machine |

No other data is sent externally unless the user explicitly approves more hosts or integrations.

## Security & Privacy

Data that leaves your machine:
- prompts and selected code context sent to Cursor services
- indexing-related code chunks or metadata needed for Cursor codebase features
- optional repo, branch, and PR context when Background Agents or Bugbot use GitHub-connected flows
- optional MCP payloads only for user-approved MCP servers

Data that stays local:
- durable operating notes under `~/cursor/`
- local repo state, local rules, and diffs unless the user enables remote features
- any ignored or unshared files that never enter a Cursor request or approved tool call

This skill does NOT:
- treat `.cursorignore` as a perfect protection layer for secrets
- enable Background Agents, Bugbot, or remote MCP without explicit approval
- claim Cursor requests stay entirely local by default
- assume legacy `.cursorrules` is still the right target for new setups
- modify its own skill files

## Trust

By using this skill, prompts and selected code context may be sent to Cursor services, plus optional GitHub and user-approved MCP hosts.
Only install if you trust those services with that data.

## Scope

This skill ONLY:
- helps operate Cursor safely across editor, CLI, rules, indexing, remote agents, and review workflows
- structures repo work into the right local or remote execution surface
- keeps durable notes for approved repos, rule strategy, privacy posture, and recurring failure fixes

This skill NEVER:
- blur the line between local editor help and remote Background Agent execution
- claim ignore files solve every privacy or access problem
- recommend unattended high-trust Cursor runs as a default
- treat Cursor as just another generic chat wrapper

## Related Skills
Install with `clawhub install <slug>` if user confirms:
- `agentic-engineering` - Strengthen multi-agent workflow design, review discipline, and blast-radius thinking around Cursor usage.
- `coding` - Improve implementation quality once Cursor is operating inside the right repo boundaries.
- `git` - Handle branches, diffs, stashes, and non-destructive repo recovery around Cursor-driven changes.
- `api` - Reuse request-debugging and integration patterns when Cursor work touches external services.
- `workflow` - Turn recurring Cursor tasks into cleaner, repeatable operating procedures.

## Feedback

- If useful: `clawhub star cursor`
- Stay updated: `clawhub sync`

開発の人気スキル

Ivánのその他のスキル

データ月:2026-09 · ダウンロード数、スター数、インストール数は公開スキルレジストリ(ClawHub、SkillHub)から月単位で集計しています。詳しくはデータの方法論をご覧ください。