ItsFlow

Create Content

內容創作v1.0.0
作者:ItsFlow更新於 2026-05-17create-content@clawhub_itsflow/create-content
文章寫作自媒體營運#Content#LinkedIn#Twitter#Social Media#Writing

據 AlphaMoat 統計,截至 2026-09,Create Content 累計下載 4,936 次、獲 6 個星標,在全部 5,078 個 AI 技能中排名第 1,874 位,在「內容創作」分類(362 個)中排名第 141 位。

累計安裝
149
累計下載
4936
星標
6
全站排名
#1,874
全站前 37% · 「內容創作」前 39%
平台累計安裝累計下載星標評論
ClawHub ↗14944346-
SkillHub ↗14849366—

各平台的計數口徑不同,統計時間不一致。

這個技能是做什麼的

該技能先透過提問澄清觀點,再按平台特點生成不同草稿並根據反饋修改;使用者可要求搜尋近期筆記、日記或會話來尋找內容角度。搜尋私人資料前應明確限定允許訪問的來源並由使用者批准。個人或業務細節可能被改寫成公開帖子,釋出前需逐項審查並移除敏感資訊。 草稿中的主張與個人事例應對照已授權的資料核實。

資料釋出於 2026-10-29

可以用來做什麼

  • 透過提問幫助明確一個初步想法和核心觀點
  • 根據已確認的來源整理可釋出內容角度
  • 為指定社交平台起草並比較多個版本

什麼時候用

  • 可以先探索觀點而不急於起草時
  • 筆記或會話來源已獲使用者批准且草稿將在釋出前稽核時

示例提示詞

以下是根據技能文件生成的示例,不代表實際執行結果。

先只使用我提供的想法,透過澄清問題幫助確定觀點;不要搜尋筆記或會話,也不要生成可直接釋出的帖子。

月度資料趨勢

累計下載4936
3731437850252026-05 · 累計下載 38202026-06 · 累計下載 39712026-07 · 累計下載 42562026-08 · 累計下載 43932026-09 · 累計下載 493626-0526-09
星標6
5672026-05 · 星標 62026-06 · 星標 62026-07 · 星標 62026-08 · 星標 62026-09 · 星標 626-0526-09

2026-09 起統計方法調整:同名技能按作者分別統計,並覆蓋全部技能。圖中虛線為調整前的月份,與之後的資料不直接比較,也不計算跨越調整的增長。

月份累計下載環比星標
2026-094936—6
2026-084393+3.2%6
2026-074256+7.2%6
2026-063971+4.0%6
2026-053820—6

SKILL.md 原文

以下是作者釋出的原始檔案,按純文字顯示,本站未做修改或稽核;其中的連結不可點選,命令請核實後再執行。抓取於 2026-10-23。

5.4 KB · ClawHub v1.0.0
---
name: create-content
description: Thinking partner that transforms ideas into platform-optimized content
version: 1.0.0
author: theflohart
tags: [content, writing, social-media, twitter, linkedin]
---

# Content Creator
展開全部(共 201 行)
A thinking partner that helps you go from rough idea to clarified insight to platform-optimized content.

**Philosophy:** Great content comes from clear thinking. We explore first, draft second.

## Usage

```
/create-content [rough idea, topic, or "help me figure out what to post"]
```

---

## Phase 1: Thinking Partner Mode

Before drafting anything, help clarify the idea.

### If user has a rough idea:

Ask 2-3 questions to sharpen it:
- "What's the specific insight or observation here?"
- "What made you think of this? What triggered it?"
- "Who needs to hear this? Why would they care?"
- "What's the counterintuitive part? What surprises people?"
- "Do you have a specific example or number to anchor this?"

### If user says "help me figure out what to post":

1. Search for recent notes, journal entries, sessions
2. Look for: observations, breakthroughs, experiments, patterns noticed
3. Present 2-3 potential angles and ask which resonates

### Stay in exploration until:

- User says "okay let's draft this" or "that's it"
- The core insight is specific and clear
- There's a hook that challenges assumptions

---

## Phase 2: Voice Guidelines

### DO:

- Short sentences. Like texting.
- Observations over wisdom. Show, don't preach.
- Specific numbers. "$120K ARR" not "good revenue"
- Personal mixed with insight
- Real examples with data
- Questions that make you think
- Self-aware humor

### DON'T:

- Corporate speak ("leverage" "synergy" "optimize")
- Long explanations
- Abstract wisdom without specifics
- Motivational fluff
- Em-dashes (instant AI tell)
- "This is why..." openings
- Any sentence over 20 words

### Red Flags (rewrite if present):

- Em-dashes (—)
- "This is why..."
- "The key is..."
- "In today's world..."
- Wisdom without specifics
- Sentences over 20 words

---

## Voice Examples (Study These)

### @levelsio Style (Raw Observations)

> "dubai is crazy because you can get iv drips, blood tests, and plumbers all on the same food delivery and ride sharing app"

**What makes it work:** Simple observation, relatable, slightly absurd. No call to action, just sharing reality.

### @marclou Style (Authentic + Celebrates Others)

> "SOLD
> 1. David vibe-coded the project in 1 week
> 2. Launch went viral on LinkedIn
> 3. Made $130/month
> 4. Got acquired for $3500"

**What makes it work:** Celebrates others' wins. Specific numbers. Simple format.

### @bryan_johnson Style (Mission-Obsessed + Data)

> "+ 46% higher hemorrhoid prevalence
> + 26% higher risk of developing hemorrhoids
> From what? Smartphone while on the toilet"

**What makes it work:** Shocking data + unexpected humor. Bold.

---

## Voice Calibration Test

Before finalizing any draft, check:

**TOO AI:**
> "Cold plunge kills autopilot for an hour—that's when you realize what you should actually build."

**REAL VOICE:**
> "been coding while alternating cold plunge and sauna. sounds dumb but i have better product ideas in 20 mins of cold than 4 hours at my desk"

**The difference:** No em-dashes. Specific detail (20 mins vs 4 hours). Self-aware ("sounds dumb"). Shows the lifestyle, doesn't explain it.

---

## Phase 3: Platform-Specific Drafting

### For X (Twitter)

**Viral Mechanics:**
- Hook in first line (pattern interrupt, surprising stat, provocative question)
- 280 characters ideal for single posts
- Threads: Each tweet must stand alone AND connect
- End with question or call to engage (not CTA)

**Formats that work:**
1. **Observation post:** "noticed [specific thing]. [insight]."
2. **Experiment post:** "tried [thing]. result: [data]. [what it means]"
3. **Contrarian take:** "[common belief]. actually: [your take]. here's why."
4. **List post:** "X things I learned from [specific experience]:"
5. **Question post:** "[provocative question]? [your angle in 1 sentence]"

**Thread structure:**
- Tweet 1: Hook (must work standalone)
- Tweet 2-N: One idea per tweet, specific examples
- Final tweet: Synthesis + engagement question

### For LinkedIn

**Viral Mechanics:**
- First line is everything (shows in feed preview)
- Line breaks create white space (easier to read)
- 1,200-1,500 characters sweet spot
- Personal story → universal insight pattern
- End with question to drive comments

**Format:**
```
[Hook line - surprising or contrarian]

[2-3 short paragraphs with the story/insight]

[Specific example or data point]

[Universal takeaway in 1 sentence]

[Question for engagement]
```

---

## Phase 4: Draft & Refine

1. **Draft 2-3 versions** for the chosen platform
2. **Run voice check** on each:
   - Is it casual enough to be a text message?
   - Specific OR observation (not vague wisdom)?
   - No em-dashes?
3. **Present options** with notes on what makes each one work
4. **Refine based on feedback** until user is happy

---

## Quick Commands

User can shortcut the process:

- `"X post about [topic]"` → Skip to drafting for X
- `"LinkedIn post about [topic]"` → Skip to drafting for LinkedIn
- `"thread about [topic]"` → Go straight to thread format
- `"explore"` or `"help me think"` → Stay in thinking partner mode longer

---

## Remember

**The goal:** Sound like a founder texting insights, not an AI writing "content."

Great content = clear thinking + specific examples + authentic voice.

If the idea isn't clear yet, keep exploring. Don't rush to draft.

「內容創作」分類下的熱門技能

ItsFlow 的其他技能

資料月份:2026-09 · 下載/星標/安裝數聚合自公開技能註冊庫(ClawHub、SkillHub),按月更新。口徑說明見資料方法。