Iván

Scholar

知識管理v1.0.0
作者:Iván更新於 2026-05-11scholar@clawhub_ivangdavila/scholar
知識庫問答資訊檢索

據 AlphaMoat 統計,截至 2026-09,Scholar 累計下載 4,734 次、獲 6 個星標,在全部 5,078 個 AI 技能中排名第 1,996 位,在「知識管理」分類(442 個)中排名第 187 位。

累計安裝
526
累計下載
4734
星標
6
全站排名
#1,996
全站前 40% · 「知識管理」前 43%
平台累計安裝累計下載星標評論
ClawHub ↗14043693-
SkillHub ↗52647346—

各平台的計數口徑不同,統計時間不一致。

這個技能是做什麼的

該技能提供 Google Scholar 學術文獻檢索的實用規則,涵蓋查詢構造、時間篩選、結果解讀、全文獲取、引用分析、提醒追蹤,以及侷限性認知與來源評估。它宣告支援多種作業系統,是一個純檢索指南類技能,不依賴二進位制或金鑰。 這是手動使用 Scholar 的檢索指南,不會自動搜尋全文或判斷品質。引用前核對論文與發表來源。

資料釋出於 2026-10-27

可以用來做什麼

  • 構造帶引號與排除詞的精確檢索式
  • 按時間篩選最新研究
  • 分析作者引用與來源聲譽

什麼時候用

  • 需要檢索學術文獻或綜述時
  • 評估文獻質量與可信度時
  • 追蹤某主題的新論文時

示例提示詞

以下是根據技能文件生成的示例,不代表實際執行結果。

用 Google Scholar 檢索某個主題的最新論文
幫我構造排除無關詞的檢索式
評估某篇論文的來源是否可信

月度資料趨勢

累計下載4734
2400365449072026-03 · 累計下載 25732026-05 · 累計下載 33562026-06 · 累計下載 35522026-07 · 累計下載 39202026-08 · 累計下載 41662026-09 · 累計下載 473426-0326-09
星標6
3562026-03 · 星標 32026-05 · 星標 52026-06 · 星標 32026-07 · 星標 62026-08 · 星標 62026-09 · 星標 626-0326-09

2026-09 起統計方法調整:同名技能按作者分別統計,並覆蓋全部技能。圖中虛線為調整前的月份,與之後的資料不直接比較,也不計算跨越調整的增長。

月份累計下載環比星標
2026-094734—6
2026-084166+6.3%6
2026-073920+10.4%6
2026-063552+5.8%3
2026-053356—5
2026-032573—3

SKILL.md 原文

以下是作者釋出的原始檔案,按純文字顯示,本站未做修改或稽核;其中的連結不可點選,命令請核實後再執行。抓取於 2026-10-23。

4.0 KB · ClawHub v1.0.0
---
name: Scholar
description: Search academic literature with Google Scholar using effective queries, citations, and filters.
metadata: {"clawdbot":{"emoji":"🎓","os":["linux","darwin","win32"]}}
---

# Google Scholar Research Rules

## Query Construction
- Exact phrases in quotes: "machine learning" finds the phrase, not separate words
展開全部(共 78 行)
- Exclude terms with minus: neural networks -deep removes deep learning results
- OR for alternatives: "global warming" OR "climate change" — must be uppercase
- author: operator for specific researchers: author:"Y LeCun"
- source: for specific journals: source:"Nature" quantum computing
- intitle: forces term in title: intitle:transformer attention

## Time Filters
- Custom range critical for recent research — default shows highly cited old papers first
- "Since 2023" for cutting-edge but less vetted work
- "Since 2020" balances recency and citation accumulation
- Sort by date for newest, sort by relevance for most cited — toggle based on need

## Understanding Results
- Citation count indicates influence, not quality — popular isn't always right
- "Cited by X" link shows who built on this work — follow research forward
- "Related articles" finds similar work — useful after finding one good paper
- Versions link shows preprints and alternate copies — often free when journal isn't
- Quotation marks in snippet show exact matches — verify relevance before clicking

## Finding Full Text
- Check "All versions" for free copies — preprints, institutional repositories
- Add filetype:pdf to find direct PDF links
- Unpaywall browser extension auto-finds legal free versions
- Request from authors directly — most will share, academia.edu and ResearchGate common
- Institutional access through library proxy — VPN to university network

## Citation Analysis
- h-index visible on author profiles — measures productivity and impact
- "Cited by" sorted by relevance shows most influential citations
- Citation count alone misleads — review papers cite heavily but add less
- Self-citations inflate metrics — check who's actually citing
- Recent citations more meaningful for living research — old papers cited by habit

## Alerts and Tracking
- Create alerts for search terms — email when new papers match
- Follow researchers via profiles — notifications for new publications
- "Cite" button exports to reference managers — BibTeX, EndNote, RefMan
- Save to library requires Google account — organizes papers for later

## Limitations to Know
- Coverage biased toward English and STEM — humanities and non-English underrepresented
- No quality filter — predatory journals appear alongside legitimate ones
- Older papers may not be indexed — pre-digital era incomplete
- Cannot search full text — only titles, abstracts, and metadata
- Ranking algorithm opaque — not always clear why results ordered as shown

## Evaluating Sources
- Check journal reputation before trusting — impact factor as rough guide
- Preprints not peer-reviewed — valuable for speed, treat as preliminary
- Conference papers vary by field — top-tier in CS, lower status in medicine
- Retracted papers may still appear — verify paper status before citing
- Thesis and dissertations are gray literature — use cautiously

## Search Strategies
- Start broad, narrow with filters — missing papers worse than sorting many
- Combine Scholar with domain databases — PubMed for medicine, IEEE for engineering
- Snowball: find one good paper, explore its citations and references
- Check review papers for comprehensive coverage — synthesize existing knowledge
- Multiple queries with synonyms — terminology varies across disciplines

## Common Mistakes
- Trusting citation count as quality measure
- Ignoring publication date — fields evolve, old papers may be outdated
- Stopping at first page of results — good papers may be buried
- Not checking for retractions or corrections
- Citing papers based only on abstract — always read methodology
- Missing preprint versions that are freely available

「知識管理」分類下的熱門技能

Iván 的其他技能

資料月份:2026-09 · 下載/星標/安裝數聚合自公開技能註冊庫(ClawHub、SkillHub),按月更新。口徑說明見資料方法。