Artificial Analysis 智能榜(2026年9月)
2026年9月,Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) 以 61.3 位居第一,Claude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)(59.8) 与 Muse Spark 1.3 (max)(59.3) 分列其后。 本榜从 446 个候选中取前 20 名。
数据更新于 2026年9月
#模型厂商评分智能指数
1CClaude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic61.365.7
2CClaude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Xhigh Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic59.864.8
3MMuse Spark 1.3 (max)Meta59.362.1
4CClaude Opus 5Anthropic59.263.1
5GGLM-5.3Z AI59.159.5
6GGrok 4.6SpaceXAI58.760.9
7QQwen 3.8 MaxAlibaba58.458.1
8GGLM-5.3-FlashZ AI58.257.5
9GGPT-5.6 Sol (max)OpenAI57.860.9
10QQwen3.8 2.4T A95BAlibaba57.157.7
11CClaude Fable 5Anthropic56.662.1
12QQwen3.8-Flash-NextAlibaba56.455.8
13MMuse Spark 1.3 (xhigh)Meta56.160.8
14CClaude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, High Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic55.862.5
15KKimi K3 (max)Kimi54.359.7
16GGPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh)OpenAI53.659.0
17DDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Reasoning, Max Effort)DeepSeek52.951.5
18CClaude Fable 5.1 (Adaptive Reasoning, Medium Effort, Default Fallback)Anthropic52.760.5
19QQwen 3.8 27BAlibaba50.952.0
20GGPT-5.6 Sol (high)OpenAI50.657.3
口径说明
来自第三方模型评测机构的公开评分。该来源每期整表替换,没有历史序列,因此不提供趋势与环比。
名次按本表的主指标从高到低重排,与来源榜单自带的名次无关。数值为当期真实数据,不做人工调整;取不到的值显示为「—」,不会用估算值填补。