据 AlphaMoat 统计,截至 2026-09,Architecture Patterns 累计下载 4,822 次、获 10 个星标,在全部 5,078 个 AI 技能中排名第 1,948 位,在「开发编程」分类(577 个)中排名第 250 位。
| 平台 | 累计安装 | 累计下载 | 星标 | 评论 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClawHub ↗ | 153 | 4,708 | 7 | - |
| SkillHub ↗ | 148 | 4,822 | 10 | — |
各平台的计数口径不同,统计时间不一致。
内容涵盖 Clean Architecture、Hexagonal Architecture 和领域驱动设计,可用于新系统设计、单体重构和团队架构规范。卡片提醒支付适配器示例仅为样例后端代码;连接真实凭据前应加入授权、用户确认、日志和环境级保护。 这些是部分骨架,需补齐项目接口、导入和实现;简单 CRUD 应避免过度设计。接真实数据库或支付服务前审阅并验证集成边界。
资料发布于 2026-10-27
以下是根据技能文档生成的示例,不代表实际运行结果。
2026-09 起统计方法调整:同名技能按作者分别统计,并覆盖全部技能。图中虚线为调整前的月份,与之后的数据不直接比较,也不计算跨越调整的增长。 该技能有同名的其他版本,调整前的数据归属当前下载量最大的这一个。
| 月份 | 累计下载 | 环比 | 星标 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09 | 4,822 | — | 10 |
| 2026-08 | 4,541 | +5.6% | 10 |
| 2026-07 | 4,302 | +9.6% | 9 |
| 2026-06 | 3,924 | +5.1% | 6 |
| 2026-05 | 3,733 | — | 7 |
| 2026-03 | 2,994 | — | 6 |
以下是作者发布的原始文件,按纯文本显示,本站未做修改或审核;其中的链接不可点击,命令请核实后再运行。抓取于 2026-10-23。
--- name: architecture-patterns model: reasoning --- # Architecture Patterns ## WHAT Backend architecture patterns for building maintainable, testable systems: Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design.
## WHEN
- Designing new backend systems from scratch
- Refactoring monoliths for better maintainability
- Establishing architecture standards for teams
- Creating testable, mockable codebases
- Planning microservices decomposition
## KEYWORDS
clean architecture, hexagonal, ports and adapters, DDD, domain-driven design, layers, entities, use cases, repositories, aggregates, bounded contexts
---
## Decision Framework: Which Pattern?
| Situation | Recommended Pattern |
|-----------|---------------------|
| Simple CRUD app | None (over-engineering) |
| Medium complexity, team standardization | Clean Architecture |
| Multiple external integrations that change frequently | Hexagonal (Ports & Adapters) |
| Complex business domain with many rules | Domain-Driven Design |
| Large system with multiple teams | DDD + Bounded Contexts |
## Quick Reference
### Clean Architecture Layers
```
┌──────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Frameworks & Drivers (UI, DB) │ ← Outer: Can change
├──────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Interface Adapters │ ← Controllers, Gateways
├──────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Use Cases │ ← Application Logic
├──────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Entities │ ← Core Business Rules
└──────────────────────────────────────┘
```
**Dependency Rule**: Dependencies point INWARD only. Inner layers never import outer layers.
### Hexagonal Architecture
```
┌─────────────┐
┌────│ Adapter │────┐ (REST API)
│ └─────────────┘ │
▼ ▼
┌──────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ Port │◄────────────►│ Domain │
└──────┘ └──────────┘
▲ ▲
│ ┌─────────────┐ │
└────│ Adapter │────┘ (Database)
└─────────────┘
```
**Ports**: Interfaces defining what the domain needs
**Adapters**: Implementations (swappable for testing)
---
## Directory Structure
```
app/
├── domain/ # Entities & business rules (innermost)
│ ├── entities/
│ │ └── user.py
│ ├── value_objects/
│ │ └── email.py
│ └── interfaces/ # Ports
│ └── user_repository.py
├── use_cases/ # Application business rules
│ └── create_user.py
├── adapters/ # Interface implementations
│ ├── repositories/
│ │ └── postgres_user_repository.py
│ └── controllers/
│ └── user_controller.py
└── infrastructure/ # Framework & external concerns
├── database.py
└── config.py
```
---
## Pattern 1: Clean Architecture
### Entity (Domain Layer)
```python
from dataclasses import dataclass
from datetime import datetime
@dataclass
class User:
"""Core entity - NO framework dependencies."""
id: str
email: str
name: str
created_at: datetime
is_active: bool = True
def deactivate(self):
"""Business rule in entity."""
self.is_active = False
def can_place_order(self) -> bool:
return self.is_active
```
### Port (Interface)
```python
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
from typing import Optional
class IUserRepository(ABC):
"""Port: defines contract, no implementation."""
@abstractmethod
async def find_by_id(self, user_id: str) -> Optional[User]:
pass
@abstractmethod
async def save(self, user: User) -> User:
pass
```
### Use Case (Application Layer)
```python
@dataclass
class CreateUserRequest:
email: str
name: str
@dataclass
class CreateUserResponse:
user: Optional[User]
success: bool
error: Optional[str] = None
class CreateUserUseCase:
"""Use case: orchestrates business logic."""
def __init__(self, user_repository: IUserRepository):
self.user_repository = user_repository # Injected dependency
async def execute(self, request: CreateUserRequest) -> CreateUserResponse:
# Business validation
existing = await self.user_repository.find_by_email(request.email)
if existing:
return CreateUserResponse(user=None, success=False, error="Email exists")
# Create entity
user = User(
id=str(uuid.uuid4()),
email=request.email,
name=request.name,
created_at=datetime.now()
)
saved = await self.user_repository.save(user)
return CreateUserResponse(user=saved, success=True)
```
### Adapter (Implementation)
```python
class PostgresUserRepository(IUserRepository):
"""Adapter: PostgreSQL implementation of the port."""
def __init__(self, pool: asyncpg.Pool):
self.pool = pool
async def find_by_id(self, user_id: str) -> Optional[User]:
async with self.pool.acquire() as conn:
row = await conn.fetchrow(
"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1", user_id
)
return self._to_entity(row) if row else None
async def save(self, user: User) -> User:
async with self.pool.acquire() as conn:
await conn.execute(
"""INSERT INTO users (id, email, name, created_at, is_active)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5)
ON CONFLICT (id) DO UPDATE SET email=$2, name=$3, is_active=$5""",
user.id, user.email, user.name, user.created_at, user.is_active
)
return user
```
---
## Pattern 2: Hexagonal (Ports & Adapters)
Best when you have multiple external integrations that may change.
```python
# Domain Service (Core)
class OrderService:
def __init__(
self,
order_repo: OrderRepositoryPort, # Port
payment: PaymentGatewayPort, # Port
notifications: NotificationPort # Port
):
self.orders = order_repo
self.payments = payment
self.notifications = notifications
async def place_order(self, order: Order) -> OrderResult:
# Pure business logic - no infrastructure details
if not order.is_valid():
return OrderResult(success=False, error="Invalid order")
payment = await self.payments.charge(order.total, order.customer_id)
if not payment.success:
return OrderResult(success=False, error="Payment failed")
order.mark_as_paid()
saved = await self.orders.save(order)
await self.notifications.send(order.customer_email, "Order confirmed")
return OrderResult(success=True, order=saved)
# Adapters (swap these for testing or changing providers)
class StripePaymentAdapter(PaymentGatewayPort):
async def charge(self, amount: Money, customer: str) -> PaymentResult:
# Real Stripe implementation
...
class MockPaymentAdapter(PaymentGatewayPort):
async def charge(self, amount: Money, customer: str) -> PaymentResult:
return PaymentResult(success=True, transaction_id="mock-123")
```
---
## Pattern 3: Domain-Driven Design
For complex business domains with many rules.
### Value Objects (Immutable)
```python
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class Email:
"""Value object: validated, immutable."""
value: str
def __post_init__(self):
if "@" not in self.value:
raise ValueError("Invalid email")
@dataclass(frozen=True)
class Money:
amount: int # cents
currency: str
def add(self, other: "Money") -> "Money":
if self.currency != other.currency:
raise ValueError("Currency mismatch")
return Money(self.amount + other.amount, self.currency)
```
### Aggregates (Consistency Boundaries)
```python
class Order:
"""Aggregate root: enforces invariants."""
def __init__(self, id: str, customer: Customer):
self.id = id
self.customer = customer
self.items: List[OrderItem] = []
self.status = OrderStatus.PENDING
self._events: List[DomainEvent] = []
def add_item(self, product: Product, quantity: int):
"""Business logic in aggregate."""
if quantity > product.max_quantity:
raise ValueError(f"Max {product.max_quantity} allowed")
item = OrderItem(product, quantity)
self.items.append(item)
self._events.append(ItemAddedEvent(self.id, item))
def submit(self):
"""State transition with invariant enforcement."""
if not self.items:
raise ValueError("Cannot submit empty order")
if self.status != OrderStatus.PENDING:
raise ValueError("Order already submitted")
self.status = OrderStatus.SUBMITTED
self._events.append(OrderSubmittedEvent(self.id))
```
### Repository Pattern
```python
class OrderRepository:
"""Persist/retrieve aggregates, publish domain events."""
async def save(self, order: Order):
await self._persist(order)
await self._publish_events(order._events)
order._events.clear()
```
---
## Testing Benefits
All patterns enable the same testing approach:
```python
# Test with mock adapter
async def test_create_user():
mock_repo = MockUserRepository()
use_case = CreateUserUseCase(user_repository=mock_repo)
result = await use_case.execute(CreateUserRequest(
email="[email protected]",
name="Test User"
))
assert result.success
assert result.user.email == "[email protected]"
```
---
## NEVER
- **Anemic Domain Models**: Entities with only data, no behavior (put logic IN entities)
- **Framework Coupling**: Business logic importing Flask, FastAPI, Django ORM
- **Fat Controllers**: Business logic in HTTP handlers
- **Leaky Abstractions**: Repository returning ORM objects instead of domain entities
- **Skipping Layers**: Controller directly accessing database
- **Over-Engineering**: Using Clean Architecture for simple CRUD apps
- **Circular Dependencies**: Use cases importing controllers
用 gh 命令行工具查看 GitHub 上的 PR 检查、工作流运行与 API 查询的技能。
聚合 16 个搜索引擎、无需 API Key 的检索技能。
用命令行直接列出、配置、授权并调用 MCP 服务与工具。
生成有效的 Mermaid 图表,如流程图、时序图、思维导图、ER 图、用户旅程等。
用受管 OAuth 访问 YouTube Data API,检索视频并管理频道内容。
通过受管的 OAuth 连接访问 GitHub REST API。
覆盖规划、实现、验证与测试的编码工作流技能。
整理 Docker 常用命令与容器工作流的技能。
按维度逐项检查代码质量与安全的评审技能。
e2e-testing-patterns 汇集 Playwright 与 Cypress 的关键用户流程测试模式。
UI Design:提供界面布局、字体、色彩、间距、无障碍和组件设计指导。
给代码质量立规矩的技能。
用 Mermaid 文本语法绘制可版本管理的软件图表。
数据月份:2026-09 · 下载/星标/安装数聚合自公开技能注册库(ClawHub、SkillHub),按月更新。口径说明见数据方法。