据 AlphaMoat 统计,截至 2026-09,Planning With Files 累计下载 3,379 次、获 7 个星标,在全部 5,078 个 AI 技能中排名第 3,327 位,在「AI 智能体」分类(969 个)中排名第 680 位。
| 平台 | 累计安装 | 累计下载 | 星标 | 评论 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClawHub ↗ | 83 | 2,907 | 6 | - |
| SkillHub ↗ | 189 | 3,379 | 7 | — |
各平台的计数口径不同,统计时间不一致。
在项目根目录维护 task_plan.md、findings.md 和 progress.md,记录阶段、证据、错误和验证结果,便于恢复工作。重大决策前重读计划,每次完成阶段后更新;每 2 次查看、浏览或搜索操作后记录发现。失败须改变方法,连续 3 次失败后向用户说明并求助。适用于复杂多步骤任务,简单问答或单文件小改可跳过;文件不放入技能目录。
资料发布于 2026-10-26
以下是根据技能文档生成的示例,不代表实际运行结果。
2026-09 起统计方法调整:同名技能按作者分别统计,并覆盖全部技能。图中虚线为调整前的月份,与之后的数据不直接比较,也不计算跨越调整的增长。 该技能有同名的其他版本,调整前的数据归属当前下载量最大的这一个。
| 月份 | 累计下载 | 环比 | 星标 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09 | 3,379 | — | 7 |
| 2026-08 | 2,735 | +10.1% | 7 |
| 2026-07 | 2,484 | +13.1% | 7 |
| 2026-06 | 2,196 | +10.7% | 7 |
| 2026-05 | 1,983 | — | 6 |
| 2026-03 | 1,452 | — | 6 |
以下是作者发布的原始文件,按纯文本显示,本站未做修改或审核;其中的链接不可点击,命令请核实后再运行。抓取于 2026-10-23。
--- name: planning-with-files model: reasoning version: 3.0.0 description: > File-based planning for complex tasks. Use persistent markdown files as working memory to survive context resets. Creates task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md. Use for any task requiring >5 tool calls, research projects, or multi-step implementations. tags: [planning, context, workflow, manus, memory, complex-tasks] ---
# Planning with Files Use persistent markdown files as your "working memory on disk." Based on context engineering principles from Manus. ## Installation ### OpenClaw / Moltbot / Clawbot ```bash npx clawhub@latest install planning-with-files ``` ## WHAT This Skill Does Treats the filesystem as persistent memory to overcome context window limitations. Three files track your state: | File | Purpose | Update Frequency | |------|---------|-----------------| | `task_plan.md` | Phases, progress, decisions | After each phase | | `findings.md` | Research, discoveries, decisions | After ANY discovery | | `progress.md` | Session log, test results, errors | Throughout session | ## WHEN to Use **Use for:** - Multi-step tasks (3+ steps) - Research tasks requiring web search - Building/creating projects from scratch - Tasks spanning >5 tool calls - Anything requiring organization across multiple files - Tasks where losing context would cause rework **Skip for:** - Simple questions - Single-file edits - Quick lookups - Tasks completable in 1-2 actions **Keywords:** complex task, multi-step, research, build project, create application, plan, organize ## The Core Pattern ``` Context Window = RAM (volatile, limited) Filesystem = Disk (persistent, unlimited) → Anything important gets written to disk. ``` ## Workflow ### Phase 1: Create Planning Files Before starting ANY complex task, create all three files in your project root: 1. **Create `task_plan.md`** — Copy from [templates/task_plan.md](templates/task_plan.md) 2. **Create `findings.md`** — Copy from [templates/findings.md](templates/findings.md) 3. **Create `progress.md`** — Copy from [templates/progress.md](templates/progress.md) ### Phase 2: Execute with Discipline Follow these rules during execution: **The 2-Action Rule:** > After every 2 view/browser/search operations, IMMEDIATELY save findings to text files. Visual/multimodal content doesn't persist — write it down before it's lost. **Read Before Decide:** Before major decisions, read your plan file. This keeps goals in your attention window after many tool calls. **Update After Act:** After completing any phase: - Mark phase status: `in_progress` → `complete` - Log any errors encountered - Note files created/modified **Log ALL Errors:** Every error goes in the plan file. This prevents repetition. ### Phase 3: Handle Errors Systematically **The 3-Strike Protocol:** ``` ATTEMPT 1: Diagnose & Fix → Read error carefully → Identify root cause → Apply targeted fix ATTEMPT 2: Alternative Approach → Same error? Try different method → Different tool? Different library? → NEVER repeat exact same failing action ATTEMPT 3: Broader Rethink → Question assumptions → Search for solutions → Consider updating the plan AFTER 3 FAILURES: Escalate to User → Explain what you tried → Share the specific error → Ask for guidance ``` **Critical:** `if action_failed: next_action != same_action` ### Phase 4: Verify Completion Use the 5-Question Reboot Test. If you can answer these, your context is solid: | Question | Answer Source | |----------|---------------| | Where am I? | Current phase in task_plan.md | | Where am I going? | Remaining phases | | What's the goal? | Goal statement in plan | | What have I learned? | findings.md | | What have I done? | progress.md | ## Quick Reference: Read vs Write | Situation | Action | Reason | |-----------|--------|--------| | Just wrote a file | DON'T read | Content still in context | | Viewed image/PDF | Write findings NOW | Multimodal → text before lost | | Browser returned data | Write to file | Screenshots don't persist | | Starting new phase | Read plan/findings | Re-orient if context stale | | Error occurred | Read relevant file | Need current state to fix | | Resuming after gap | Read all planning files | Recover state | ## Session Recovery When starting a new session, check for previous work: ```bash # Check if planning files exist ls task_plan.md findings.md progress.md 2>/dev/null # If they exist, read them all before continuing cat task_plan.md findings.md progress.md ``` If planning files exist from a previous session: 1. Read all three files to recover context 2. Run `git diff --stat` to see what changed 3. Update planning files with any missing context 4. Continue from where you left off ## Templates Copy these to start: - [templates/task_plan.md](templates/task_plan.md) — Phase tracking - [templates/findings.md](templates/findings.md) — Research storage - [templates/progress.md](templates/progress.md) — Session logging ## Scripts Helper scripts for automation: - `scripts/init-session.sh` — Initialize all planning files - `scripts/check-complete.sh` — Verify all phases complete ## References - [references/manus-principles.md](references/manus-principles.md) — Context engineering principles from Manus ## Anti-Patterns | Don't | Do Instead | |-------|------------| | Use TodoWrite for persistence | Create task_plan.md file | | State goals once and forget | Re-read plan before decisions | | Hide errors and retry silently | Log errors to plan file | | Stuff everything in context | Store large content in files | | Start executing immediately | Create plan file FIRST | | Repeat failed actions | Track attempts, mutate approach | | Create files in skill directory | Create files in your project | ## NEVER Do 1. **NEVER start a complex task without task_plan.md** — this is non-negotiable 2. **NEVER repeat a failed action exactly** — track what you tried, mutate the approach 3. **NEVER ignore errors** — log every error with resolution attempts 4. **NEVER rely on memory after >10 tool calls** — re-read your plan 5. **NEVER skip the 2-Action Rule for visual content** — multimodal data gets lost 6. **NEVER proceed past 3 failures without escalating** — ask the user for help 7. **NEVER create planning files in the skill directory** — they go in your project root
记录自身发现以实现自我改进的技能
帮助用户发现和安装智能体技能,当用户询问如「如何做X」、「找X的技能」、「有能做...的吗」等问题时
给 AI agent 用的浏览器自动化命令行技能。
自我反思+自我批评+自我学习+自组织记忆。智能体评估自身工作、发现错误并持续改进。
在安装第三方技能之前,按清单审查来源、权限与危险模式的技能。
类型化知识图谱,用于结构化智能体记忆与可组合技能。适用于以下场景:创建/查询实体(人物、项目、任务、事件、文档)、关联相关对象、强制执行约束、将多步操作规划为图谱变换,或当技能需要共享状态时。触发关键词包括"记住""我知道关于什么""将X链接到Y""显示依赖关系"、实体增删改查操作,以及跨技能数据访问。
将 AI 代理从任务执行者转变为能够预见需求、持续优化的主动伙伴。现已支持 WAL Protocol、Working Buffer、Autonomous Crons 及经过实战验证的模式。属于 Hal Stack 🦞。
创建有效技能指南。当用户希望创建新技能(或更新现有技能)以利用专业知识、工作流程或工具集成扩展 Claude 的能力时,应使用此技能。
涵盖安全、性能、可维护性、正确性和测试的系统化代码审查模式,包含严重等级、结构化反馈指南、审查流程及需避免的反模式。适用于审查 PR、建立审查标准或提升审查质量。
{"answer":"使用 Playwright 和 Cypress 构建稳定高效的 E2E 测试套件:覆盖核心链路,消除不稳定测试,集成 CI/CD。"}
{"answer":"涵盖基础、模式与反模式的全面UI设计技能。包括布局、排版、色彩、间距、无障碍、动效及组件设计。适用于构建Web界面、审查设计质量或打造独特UI。"}
务实的编码规范,编写简洁、可维护的代码——命名、函数、结构、反模式及编辑前安全检查。适用于编写新代码、重构现有代码、审查代码质量或制定编码规范。
使用Mermaid语法创建软件图表。当用户需要通过类图、时序图、流程图、ER图、C4架构图、状态图、Git图等创建、可视化或记录软件时使用。触发词包括绘制图表、可视化、建模、梳理结构或展示系统流程。
数据月份:2026-09 · 下载/星标/安装数聚合自公开技能注册库(ClawHub、SkillHub),按月更新。口径说明见数据方法。