据 AlphaMoat 统计,截至 2026-10,Using Superpowers 累计下载 54,155 次、获 79 个星标,按累计下载量在本次参与排名的 10,914 个 AI 技能中排名第 460 位,在「AI 智能体」分类(1,632 个)中排名第 96 位。
列表默认按累计下载量排序,也可按星标排序;详情页排名按累计下载量计算。
| 平台 | 累计下载 | 星标 | 评论 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ClawHub ↗ | 3.6万 | 63 | - |
| SkillHub ↗ | 5.4万 | 79 | — |
各平台的计数口径不同,统计时间不一致。
正文只有一条规则:回复或反问之前先判断有没有相关技能,只要存在可能性就调用,发现不适用再放下。流程图画出了顺序:收到消息先判断是否适用,适用就调用并声明用它做什么,技能自带清单则为每一项建待办,然后严格照技能执行,判断不适用才直接回复。正文另有一张自我辩解对照表,把「只是简单问题」「先看代码库」「我记得这个技能」这类念头列为借口并逐条驳回。多个技能同时适用时先流程类(头脑风暴、调试)后实现类;刚性技能照做,柔性技能按原则调整。加载走宿主提供的 Skill 工具,正文点名 Claude Code,其他环境要求查各自文档。
资料发布于 2026-10-26
以下是根据技能文档生成的示例,不代表实际运行结果。
2026-09 起统计方法调整:同名技能按作者分别统计,并覆盖全部技能。图中虚线为调整前的月份,与之后的数据不直接比较,也不计算跨越调整的增长。 该技能有同名的其他版本,调整前的数据归属当前下载量最大的这一个。
| 月份 | 累计下载 | 环比 | 星标 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10 | 5.4万 | — | 79 |
| 2026-09 | 3.9万 | — | 79 |
| 2026-08 | 3.6万 | +1.4% | 79 |
| 2026-07 | 3.5万 | — | 79 |
| 2026-05 | 3.2万 | — | 69 |
| 2026-03 | 2.3万 | — | 49 |
以下是作者发布的原始文件,按纯文本显示,本站未做修改或审核;其中的链接不可点击,命令请核实后再运行。抓取于 2026-10-23。
--- name: using-superpowers description: Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring Skill tool invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions --- <EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT> If you think there is even a 1% chance a skill might apply to what you are doing, you ABSOLUTELY MUST invoke the skill. IF A SKILL APPLIES TO YOUR TASK, YOU DO NOT HAVE A CHOICE. YOU MUST USE IT.
This is not negotiable. This is not optional. You cannot rationalize your way out of this.
</EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
## How to Access Skills
**In Claude Code:** Use the `Skill` tool. When you invoke a skill, its content is loaded and presented to you—follow it directly. Never use the Read tool on skill files.
**In other environments:** Check your platform's documentation for how skills are loaded.
# Using Skills
## The Rule
**Invoke relevant or requested skills BEFORE any response or action.** Even a 1% chance a skill might apply means that you should invoke the skill to check. If an invoked skill turns out to be wrong for the situation, you don't need to use it.
```dot
digraph skill_flow {
"User message received" [shape=doublecircle];
"Might any skill apply?" [shape=diamond];
"Invoke Skill tool" [shape=box];
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" [shape=box];
"Has checklist?" [shape=diamond];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" [shape=box];
"Follow skill exactly" [shape=box];
"Respond (including clarifications)" [shape=doublecircle];
"User message received" -> "Might any skill apply?";
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Invoke Skill tool" [label="yes, even 1%"];
"Might any skill apply?" -> "Respond (including clarifications)" [label="definitely not"];
"Invoke Skill tool" -> "Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'";
"Announce: 'Using [skill] to [purpose]'" -> "Has checklist?";
"Has checklist?" -> "Create TodoWrite todo per item" [label="yes"];
"Has checklist?" -> "Follow skill exactly" [label="no"];
"Create TodoWrite todo per item" -> "Follow skill exactly";
}
```
## Red Flags
These thoughts mean STOP—you're rationalizing:
| Thought | Reality |
|---------|---------|
| "This is just a simple question" | Questions are tasks. Check for skills. |
| "I need more context first" | Skill check comes BEFORE clarifying questions. |
| "Let me explore the codebase first" | Skills tell you HOW to explore. Check first. |
| "I can check git/files quickly" | Files lack conversation context. Check for skills. |
| "Let me gather information first" | Skills tell you HOW to gather information. |
| "This doesn't need a formal skill" | If a skill exists, use it. |
| "I remember this skill" | Skills evolve. Read current version. |
| "This doesn't count as a task" | Action = task. Check for skills. |
| "The skill is overkill" | Simple things become complex. Use it. |
| "I'll just do this one thing first" | Check BEFORE doing anything. |
| "This feels productive" | Undisciplined action wastes time. Skills prevent this. |
| "I know what that means" | Knowing the concept ≠ using the skill. Invoke it. |
## Skill Priority
When multiple skills could apply, use this order:
1. **Process skills first** (brainstorming, debugging) - these determine HOW to approach the task
2. **Implementation skills second** (frontend-design, mcp-builder) - these guide execution
"Let's build X" → brainstorming first, then implementation skills.
"Fix this bug" → debugging first, then domain-specific skills.
## Skill Types
**Rigid** (TDD, debugging): Follow exactly. Don't adapt away discipline.
**Flexible** (patterns): Adapt principles to context.
The skill itself tells you which.
## User Instructions
Instructions say WHAT, not HOW. "Add X" or "Fix Y" doesn't mean skip workflows.
把开发过程中的经验、错误与纠正记录为 Markdown 文件,供后续复用并晋升为工作区记忆。
用自然语言描述需求,在本地与远程技能市场里找技能并给出推荐的技能。
给 AI agent 用的浏览器自动化命令行技能。
把用户纠正与自我复盘沉淀成分层记忆、并按使用情况升降级的技能。
一份为 AI 代理规划主动跟进、工作记忆与复盘流程的工作区配置指南。
指导如何创建与更新有效 Claude 技能的写作指南。
在安装第三方技能之前,按清单审查来源、权限与危险模式的技能。
把盛唐诗人李白的诗学观、意象系统与口吻,蒸馏成 AI 可调用的角色包。
在动手实现前把想法谈成设计与规格的技能。
writing-plans 在编码前将需求整理为详细实现计划。
在当前会话里为每个任务派新子代理执行实现计划。
在声称任务完成、修复或通过之前,先运行适当的验证并检查结果。
Requesting Code Review 用于在任务完成、实现重大功能或合并前检查工作是否符合要求。
数据月份:2026-10 · 下载/星标数聚合自公开技能注册库(ClawHub、SkillHub),按月更新。口径说明见数据方法。